Networks – CCK08

Posted by Gina Rosenthal in CCK08 | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

This week has been about networks in the CCK08 course. I haven’t posted or responded much to posts. My excuses:

  • End of the quarter at work
  • Group at school is non-technical, I’m practicing positive inter-dependence and helping them

But I have been reading, and thinking, and talking about the information flowing through the CCK08 network about networks. Valdis Krebs on networks was amazing, and brought me back to my undergrad years. His presentation reminded me that you can represent networks inthe following ways:

  1. Hierarchical (e.g. org charts)
  2. Hub and spoke (obvious informal networks)
  3. Just connecting the dots that show us how the work really gets done (sound familiar to anyone at EMC?).

What I thought of almost instantly was the big E2.0/L2.0/Web 2.0 buzzword: Community. Everyone is racing to set up a “community”. What do people mean when they say that? Do they mean some of the things that Valdis is able to uncover with his network maps, for example:

  • Expert Location – put the experts out there with your customers
  • Communities of Practice – form learning communities with your customers
  • Key Opinion Leaders – Put the key influencers out there with your customers

Do people even think this far when they are making the community — why do you want one? Because you were told to make one? If that is the only motivation, the community will die because there is not a network feeding it, breathing life into it.

The question remaining for me is: is a community a network? Or is the network the energizing force that powers a community?

2 Responses to Networks – CCK08

  1. Ed Webb says:

    Is the network infrastructure and the community superstructure? That would be a material/ideal dichotomy, with the network being the technology and the pathways, the community being the people and the content.

    If we are conceiving of both community and network as being made of people (like Soylent Green), then perhaps the network is the larger collectivity, and communities emerge within it through more intense interactions among subsets of the people who make up the network.

  2. gminks says:

    I think that is what I’m saying – the network is the connections (being associated) but communities are something more intense as you put it.

    Loved the Cthulu quote on your blog — too true huh.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.